Two-party consent states for call recording: the 2026 list
Which US states require every party's consent to record a call, with statute citations, what happens on interstate calls, and the recording notice to use.
By the DialSavvy team5 min read
On this page
Two-party consent states for call recording, more precisely all-party consent states, require everyone on a call to agree before it is recorded. As of October 2026, 11 states mainly require all-party consent, Connecticut and Nevada require it for phone calls, and federal law and the other states need only one party. A recording notice at the start of every call is the simplest way to cover all of them.
Federal law: one party’s consent
The federal wiretap law sets the floor for the whole country. Under 18 U.S.C. 2511(2)(d), it is not unlawful for a person to record a call they are a party to, or one where a party has given prior consent, unless the recording is made for a criminal or tortious purpose. A rep recording their own sales call meets the federal rule.
States can be stricter, and many are. The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press keeps a state-by-state recording guide, and its introduction notes that every state except Vermont has at least one recording law. Vermont has none, so only the federal rule applies there.
The all-party consent states for phone calls
The table lists the states that require every party’s consent to record a phone call, with the statute the RCFP guide cites for each. The RCFP state pages were last updated between October 2019 and August 2021, so confirm the current text with your counsel.
| State | Statute | Rule for phone calls |
|---|---|---|
| California | Cal. Penal Code § 632(a) | All parties to a confidential communication |
| Connecticut | Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-570d | All parties, or civil liability; the criminal law needs one party |
| Delaware | Del. Code Ann. tit. 11, § 1335(a)(4) | All parties under the privacy law; the wiretap law (§ 2402(c)(4)) says one party |
| Florida | Fla. Stat. § 934.03(2)(d) | All parties |
| Illinois | 720 ILCS 5/14-1, 5/14-2 | All parties to a private call |
| Maryland | Md. Code, Cts. & Jud. Proc. § 10-402(c)(3) | All parties |
| Massachusetts | Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 272, § 99(C) | All parties; applies to secret recordings |
| Michigan | Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.539c | All parties for outsiders; courts disagree on participants |
| Montana | Mont. Code Ann. § 45-8-213(1)(c) | Knowledge of all parties; a warning is an exception |
| Nevada | Nev. Rev. Stat. § 200.620 | All parties for phone calls |
| New Hampshire | N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 570-A:2 | All parties |
| Pennsylvania | 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. §§ 5703, 5704(4) | All parties |
| Washington | Rev. Code Wash. § 9.73.030 | All parties; a recorded announcement counts as consent |
Some states are easy to misread. Oregon and Missouri need only one party’s consent for phone calls. Hawaii and Maine require all parties only for conversations in particularly private places. In Delaware, where two statutes conflict, the RCFP advises getting every party’s consent, and in Michigan, courts disagree on whether a participant may record without the others’ consent.
Interstate calls: plan for the stricter state
A rep in Virginia, which needs one party’s consent for phone calls, who records a call with a buyer in Maryland, an all-party state, may be liable under Maryland law, the RCFP guide’s own example. The guide notes that some courts apply the law of the state where the recording device is, while others apply the law of the state where the recorded person is. That lets the person who was recorded choose where to sue.
California’s Supreme Court settled the question for calls into California. In Kearney v. Salomon Smith Barney, decided on 13 Jul 2006, a brokerage’s Atlanta office had recorded calls with California clients without telling them, which Georgia law allowed. The court applied California law to those calls and let the claim for an injunction go forward. It also noted that a business that tells callers at the start that the call is recorded would not violate § 632.
Two more facts make a state-by-state approach fragile for sales teams:
- Area codes do not show location. A mobile number with a Texas area code can belong to someone who lives in California.
- Buyers travel. The person may take your call from a different state than the one in your CRM.
The recording notice: the practical standard
Most US teams use one rule for every call: tell the person at the start that the call is recorded. The RCFP introduction says consent is generally presumed when the parties are warned of the recording and continue the conversation. Several all-party states say so in their own terms:
- Washington treats a reasonably effective recorded announcement as consent.
- Connecticut’s civil statute accepts consent in writing, verbal consent that is recorded, or a recorded warning.
- Montana exempts recordings of people who were warned.
- Massachusetts applies its law to secret recordings.
| Approach | How it works | Trade-off |
|---|---|---|
| Notice at the start of every call | The rep says the call is recorded before the conversation starts | One rule for all states; the person can object or hang up |
| Ask, then record | The rep asks for permission and starts recording after a yes | The yes is on the recording; one more step in the opener |
| No recording for all-party states | Recording is off by area code or CRM state | Breaks when the area code or the CRM state is wrong |
Steps for your team
- Write one US policy: a recording notice at the start of every call, whatever the state.
- Put the notice in the opener, before the reason for the call. For example: “Hi Dana, this is Sam from Acme. This call is recorded.”
- Start recording before the notice, so the notice is on the recording.
- If the person objects, stop recording or end the call, and note it in the CRM.
- Apply the same rule to call transcripts, since they are made from the recording.
- For calls outside the US, check each country’s rules. See calling by country.
- Review the policy with your counsel, starting with California, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Washington if you call them often.
How DialSavvy handles this
DialSavvy records calls and produces transcripts and AI call summaries. Recording rules by country and per-state US rules, which set a notice, all-party consent, or rep-only recording, are coming. Until they ship, put the notice in your opener. See DialSavvy compliance, and for when to call each region, legal calling hours by country.
Add the one-sentence notice to your opener script today, and listen to 5 recordings next week to check that reps say it.
Not legal advice. This is a plain summary of public rules as of Oct 15, 2026. Rules change and depend on who you call and how: check with your counsel before you rely on it.
Sources
- 18 U.S. Code 2511, Interception and disclosure of wire, oral, or electronic communications prohibited, Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School (law.cornell.edu)
- Introduction to the Reporter's Recording Guide, Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press (rcfp.org)
- Reporter's Recording Guide: state-by-state recording laws, Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press (rcfp.org)
- California: Reporter's Recording Guide, Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press (rcfp.org)
- Connecticut: Reporter's Recording Guide, Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press (rcfp.org)
- Delaware: Reporter's Recording Guide, Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press (rcfp.org)
- Michigan: Reporter's Recording Guide, Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press (rcfp.org)
- Washington: Reporter's Recording Guide, Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press (rcfp.org)
- Kearney v. Salomon Smith Barney, Inc. (Cal. Supreme Court, 13 Jul 2006), Stanford Law School, SCOCAL (scocal.stanford.edu)
Checked against these sources by the DialSavvy team. How we write. Spotted an error? Email hello@dialsavvy.com.